Super PI small PI calculator, and it pretty much sums up how fast is your processor. Just run the Super PI calculator and post results or even compare it with other people here. Let’s expose our processors.
Windows users can compare results of total time taken to calculate 1M digits of PI.
Linux users can compare results of command, ./super_pi 20
I admit, I shouldn’t be talking about processors speeds with the kind of outdated processor I have. But I believe my 2mb L2 is still keeping me in competetion 
Here are my results :
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.472 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.616 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.892 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.888 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.892 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.892 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.900 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.896 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.896 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.900 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.896 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.876 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.896 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.904 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.884 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.884 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.872 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.856 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.796 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.700 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 37.286 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.224 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 37.510( 0.912) Sec.
So it takes 37.510 seconds to calculate 1M digits of PI at my Pentium M Centrino 1.73Ghz with 2MB L2. Will post results from Blade Power Edge Server at my workplace which is a Quad Core state of art Server.
October 31, 2007 at 7:20 pm
Pentium core 2 – 1.83Ghz, 1GB Ram, 2MB L2 Cache
32.766 seconds .. 32 seconds on an average
October 31, 2007 at 7:23 pm
Windows / Linux ?
November 1, 2007 at 7:55 am
Office PC : 52.125s , Damn!!!???
Windows
Intel (R) Pentium (R) 4, 2.80Ghz
November 1, 2007 at 7:59 am
Another one, Windows
39.185s
Intel (R) Pentium (R) D CPU, 3.40Ghz
These are new Desktops at Office.
November 1, 2007 at 8:12 am
Windows,
42s
Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.20Ghz
This one is a Blade Server
November 3, 2007 at 4:53 pm
Core 2 Due – 2.33Ghz, 2GB Ram, 4MB L2 Cache
1M – 22 Sec
2M – 52 Sec
November 15, 2007 at 4:47 pm
whats wrong with the blade server?
November 15, 2007 at 4:50 pm
core 2, 2ghz,4mb l2,windows
26 secs,
November 15, 2007 at 4:51 pm
Even I was wondering, Looks like the test used up only on one core or sthing like that. Its a quad core by the way. May be the blade needs a 64bit OS
November 16, 2007 at 7:39 pm
Pentium Core 2 Duo 2,6 MHz 2 GB RAM
+ 000h 00m 18s [ 1M]
+ 000h 00m 45s [ 2M]
December 22, 2007 at 3:33 am
Dell precision, duo core, 2,7 Ghz, 2G ram …. 32 M of PI have taken only 17 sec ………..
January 17, 2008 at 12:05 am
Pentium dual core 2.66 ghz with 2gigs of ram 19 secs running on vista
January 17, 2008 at 3:52 am
Dell Vostro 1500 Laptop
Intel T7500 Core 2 Duo 2.2 GHz; 4MB Cache; 2GB RAM; Win XP
21 seconds to 1M digit
52 seconds to 2M digit
January 31, 2008 at 1:03 am
Pentium 4(C) 3.4 GHz Northwood, 512KB L2 cache, 4 GB DDR dual chan PC3200 800 MHz RAM, Win XP Pro SP2
45 seconds 1M digits (temp: 38C at start, 48C at finish)
February 16, 2008 at 9:29 am
Core 2 Duo E8400 oc’d to 4.05 Ghz, 6mb L2 cache, 2GB RAM…. 11.839 seconds…. wow.
February 21, 2008 at 6:44 pm
Athlon 64X2 4400MH 45 sec …..1M of pi
February 26, 2008 at 6:26 am
RJ that’s the best I have seen!!!
March 3, 2008 at 10:55 am
I think Windows is giving *lesser* results than Linux for the same machines. Can someone confirm this for this lazy animal ?
March 8, 2008 at 8:42 am
Ya, I think Windows machines are giving +10 secs from Linux counterparts. I think it has to be something with the binaries are implemented on both OSes.
March 10, 2008 at 8:56 pm
q6600 @ 3.00 ghz
1m = 17 sec
March 21, 2008 at 11:24 am
14.687 sec on 1 m
E8500 stock
March 26, 2008 at 3:10 am
q6600 @ 2.4 Ghz
1M = 22.453s
May 8, 2008 at 11:30 am
1M=18.813s
E6530 Dual core 3ghz
May 23, 2008 at 10:22 pm
q6600 o/c@3.11ghz – ubuntu 8.04 x86_64
1M = 12.537 secs
June 8, 2008 at 5:31 pm
Core 2 Due – 2.5Ghz, 2GB Ram, 6MB L2 Cache
1M – 19.745 Sec
2M – 51.899 Sec
July 23, 2008 at 8:51 pm
1M – 18.141s
2M – 42.343s
4M – 1min 35.84s
Q6600 @ 2.8Ghz (400 x 7)
DDR3 @ 1600 mhz (7-7-7-20)
Windows XP SP2
Will try Q6600 @ 3.2Ghz somewhere this week.
November 26, 2008 at 9:19 am
1M-30s
E2180 dual core 2.0 Ghz
with RAM DDRII 1 GB run at Win XP
1M-26s
overclock 2.4 GHz
December 3, 2008 at 12:22 pm
E7300 Core 2 Due – 2.66Ghz, 4GB Ram, 3MB L2 Cache
1M – 20.45 Sec
2M – 50.12 Sec
December 22, 2008 at 2:25 am
intel Core i7 920 (new…yay) – 2.66Ghz 8MB L3, 8GB PC 9200
1M- 13.89
2M – 29.19
Vista x64
January 1, 2009 at 12:27 am
e7300 @ 3.2ghz = 16 seconds for 1mb
40 seconds for 2mb
January 1, 2009 at 3:44 pm
Acer Aspire One A110L (netbook), Intel Atom N270 @1.6GHz, 1.5GB RAM, Linpus Linux Lite.
—— Started super_pi run : Thu Jan 1 18:12:40 EET 2009
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 1.280 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 3.916 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 4.476 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 4.372 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 4.496 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 4.712 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 4.672 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 4.712 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 4.488 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 4.524 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 4.396 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 4.376 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 4.540 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 4.472 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 4.280 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 4.428 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 4.408 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 4.156 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 4.164 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 3.820 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 88.286 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.472 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 88.758( 2.188) Sec.
January 1, 2009 at 3:51 pm
Acer Aspire One A110L (netbook), Intel Atom N270 @1.6GHz, 1.5GB RAM, Linpus Linux Lite = 191 seconds for 2MB
January 10, 2009 at 5:00 am
E5200 @ 3.7 GHz= 17 Seconds (1 million super pi run)
January 11, 2009 at 7:02 pm
Acer Aspire One A110L (netbook), Intel Atom N270 @1.6GHz, 512 MB RAM, Eeebuntu
—— Started super_pi run : Sun Jan 11 20:47:15 EET 2009
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 1.240 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 3.592 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 4.120 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 4.164 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 4.100 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 4.160 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 4.096 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 4.124 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 4.096 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 4.136 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 4.124 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 4.100 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 4.116 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 4.096 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 4.084 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 4.092 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 4.044 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 4.060 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 3.888 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 3.568 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 81.261 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.420 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 81.681( 2.016) Sec.
—— Ended super_pi run : Sun Jan 11 20:48:36 EET 2009
January 16, 2009 at 10:01 pm
intel c2d 1.83ghz 2gb ram on ubuntu 8.10 intrepid ibex
i used a different program from the linux repos, (it was called “pi”) and i got 11.000s for 1000000 digits
=D
anyone else tried this program? i still think thats pretty good considering i had 6 windows open running quite a lot.
March 15, 2009 at 6:52 pm
E5200 @ 3.56GHZ
Windows XP 1M: 15.9 seconds
Ubuntu 8.04 1M: 13.4 seconds (8.4% faster)
Pentium D 805 @ 3.8GHZ
Windows XP 1M: 35 seconds
Ubuntu 8.04 1M: 23 seconds (33% faster)
Major jump between Windows and Linux when it comes to NetBurst architecture.
May 3, 2009 at 3:02 am
Ubuntu 9.04 64 bit and Intel Core 2 Duo E6750 @ 2.66 GHz with 4 GB DDR2 RAM
14.721 seconds
May 27, 2009 at 6:14 pm
Ubuntu 9.04
Intel i7 920 overclocked to from 2.67GHZ to 4.0Ghz
Gigabyte EX58 Extreme motherboard, air only at the mo
OCZ DD3 2000 Mhz
super_pi 20
—— Started super_pi run : Wed May 27 19:07:35 BST 2009
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.180 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 0.372 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 0.424 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 0.424 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 0.424 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 0.428 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 0.424 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 0.424 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 0.424 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 0.424 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 0.428 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 0.424 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 0.428 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 0.424 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 0.424 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 0.420 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 0.420 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 0.412 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 0.392 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 0.368 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 8.409 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.048 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 8.457( 0.252) Sec.
—— Ended super_pi run : Wed May 27 19:07:43 BST 2009
Only hitting one core the other seven where sitting there idle !!
June 6, 2009 at 9:54 am
Intel Celeron 336 2.8GHz – 3min 2sec 2M. Sooo slow!
July 24, 2009 at 4:26 pm
77.6 sec. : Toshiba NB200 – Atom N280 – 1.66Ghz – Linux